Re: Built-in connection pooler
От | Ryan Lambert |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Built-in connection pooler |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAN-V+g9gTUhR_cxBr2yjc3MMbpk+kopwbbiHB6kRe2whfjFYnQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Built-in connection pooler (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: Built-in connection pooler
Re: Built-in connection pooler |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I attached new version of the patch with fixed indentation problems and
> Win32 specific fixes.
Great, this latest patch applies cleanly to master. installcheck world still passes.
> "connections_proxies" is used mostly to toggle connection pooling.
> Using more than 1 proxy is be needed only for huge workloads (hundreds
> connections).
> Using more than 1 proxy is be needed only for huge workloads (hundreds
> connections).
My testing showed using only one proxy performing very poorly vs not using the pooler, even at 300 connections, with -3% TPS. At lower numbers of connections it was much worse than other configurations I tried. I just shared my full pgbench results [1], the "No Pool" and "# Proxies 2" data is what I used to generate the charts I previously shared. The 1 proxy and 10 proxy data I had referred to but hadn't shared the results, sorry about that.
> And "session_pool_size" is core parameter which determine efficiency of
> pooling.> The main trouble with it now, is that it is per database/user
> combination. Each such combination will have its own connection pool.
> Choosing optimal value of pooler backends is non-trivial task. It
> certainly depends on number of available CPU cores.
> But if backends and mostly disk-bounded, then optimal number of pooler
> worker can be large than number of cores.
I will do more testing around this variable next. It seems that increasing session_pool_size for connection_proxies = 1 might help and leaving it at its default was my problem.
> PgPRO EE version of connection pooler has "idle_pool_worker_timeout"
> parameter which allows to terminate idle workers.+1
> It is possible to implement it also for vanilla version of pooler. But
> primary intention of this patch was to minimize changes in Postgres core
Understood.
I attached a patch to apply after your latest patch [2] with my suggested changes to the docs. I tried to make things read smoother without altering your meaning. I don't think the connection pooler chapter fits in The SQL Language section, it seems more like Server Admin functionality so I moved it to follow the chapter on HA, load balancing and replication. That made more sense to me looking at the overall ToC of the docs.
Thanks,
Ryan
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: