EXPLAIN ANALYZE not displaying recheck condition

Was this intentional?  I double checked the release notes and didn't find any changes that indicate this was expected.  

An example is a query such as:

EXPLAIN (ANALYZE)
SELECT r.highway, r.ref, r.way
  FROM osm.boundary_polygon b
  INNER JOIN osm.road_line r ON ST_Contains(b.way, r.way)
  WHERE b.name = 'Jefferson County'
;

Output from PG11 shows the recheck cond:

Nested Loop  (cost=29.28..2610.82 rows=220 width=237) (actual time=20.466..1900.878 rows=62585 loops=1)
  ->  Seq Scan on boundary_polygon b  (cost=0.00..132.16 rows=1 width=5627) (actual time=0.206..0.323 rows=1 loops=1)
        Filter: (name = 'Jefferson County'::text)
        Rows Removed by Filter: 492
  ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on road_line r  (cost=29.28..2476.45 rows=220 width=237) (actual time=20.251..1879.286 rows=62585 loops=1)
        Recheck Cond: (b.way ~ way)
        Filter: _st_contains(b.way, way)
        Rows Removed by Filter: 8803
        Heap Blocks: exact=2273
        ->  Bitmap Index Scan on gix_osm_road_line  (cost=0.00..29.23 rows=659 width=0) (actual time=14.517..14.517 rows=71388 loops=1)
              Index Cond: (b.way ~ way)
Planning Time: 0.213 ms
Execution Time: 1910.810 ms

Output from Pg12 does not show recheck:

Nested Loop  (cost=29.24..18887.33 rows=39206 width=234) (actual time=12.757..1064.333 rows=62585 loops=1)
  ->  Seq Scan on boundary_polygon b  (cost=0.00..109.16 rows=1 width=5627) (actual time=0.169..0.238 rows=1 loops=1)
        Filter: (name = 'Jefferson County'::text)
        Rows Removed by Filter: 492
  ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on road_line r  (cost=29.24..18777.51 rows=66 width=234) (actual time=12.578..1055.015 rows=62585 loops=1)
        Filter: st_contains(b.way, way)
        Rows Removed by Filter: 8803
        Heap Blocks: exact=2505
        ->  Bitmap Index Scan on gix_osm_road_line  (cost=0.00..29.23 rows=659 width=0) (actual time=11.285..11.285 rows=71388 loops=1)
              Index Cond: (way @ b.way)
Planning Time: 0.613 ms
Execution Time: 1068.370 ms

Thanks,