Re: Fix XML handling with DOCTYPE
| От | Ryan Lambert |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Fix XML handling with DOCTYPE |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAN-V+g-Bpv-Uxm1Rjw1dwLWk6-rXLpysNjRFyeeqg_9=ayiFwA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Fix XML handling with DOCTYPE (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Fix XML handling with DOCTYPE
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I am unable to get latest patches I found [1] to apply cleanly to current branches. It's possible I missed the latest patches so if I'm using the wrong ones please let me know. I tried against master, 11.2 stable and the 11.2 tag with similar results. It's quite possible it's user error on my end, I am new to this process but didn't have issues with the previous patches when I tested those a couple weeks ago.
Ryan Lambert
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 5:07 PM Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net> wrote:
On 03/23/19 18:22, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Out of curiosity, what further processing would you expect libxml to do?
>
> Hm, I'd have thought it'd try to parse the arguments to some extent,
> but maybe not. Does everybody reimplement attribute parsing for
> themselves when using PIs?
Yeah, the content of a PI (whatever's after the target name) is left
all to be defined by whatever XML-using application might care about
that PI.
It could have an attribute=value syntax inspired by XML elements, or
some other form entirely, but there'd just better not be any ?> in it.
Regards,
-Chap
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: