Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring
| От | Chris Travers |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAN-RpxBQX834juPjwmsKha9RwESU5Br8XSrcdXv326-VYF00=g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:41 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 09:27:35PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-09-25 11:50:47 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> PGDLLIMPORT changes don't get back-patched as well...
>
> We've been more aggressive with that lately, and I think that's good. It
> just is a unnecessarily portability barrier for extension to be
> judicious in applying that.
Agreed. Are there any objections with the proposal of changing the
interruption pending flags in miscadmin.h to use sig_atomic_t?
ClientConnectionLost would gain PGDLLIMPORT at the same time.
I am strongly in favor of doing this.
--
Michael
Best Regards,
Chris Travers
Head of Database
Saarbrücker Straße 37a, 10405 Berlin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: