On 03.03.23 21:16, Dean Rasheed wrote: > I think this new feature ought to be mentioned in the docs somewhere. > Perhaps a sentence or two in the note below table 9.49 would suffice, > since it looks like that's where jsonpath numbers are mentioned for > the first time.
Done. I actually put it into the data types chapter, where some other differences between SQL and SQL/JSON syntax were already discussed.
> In jsonpath_scan.l, I think the hex/oct/bininteger cases could do with > a comment, such as > > /* Non-decimal integers in ECMAScript; must not have underscore after radix */ > hexinteger 0[xX]{hexdigit}(_?{hexdigit})* > octinteger 0[oO]{octdigit}(_?{octdigit})* > bininteger 0[bB]{bindigit}(_?{bindigit})* > > since that's different from the main lexer's syntax.
done
> Perhaps it's worth mentioning that difference in the docs.