Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress
| От | Craig Ringer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAMsr+YHvzLbXffAUcMNQDdui9GHHT1+kqOwyknQ5Yw7aebfKpA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 22:09, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 2018-Jun-01, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 28 May 2018 at 15:06, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> > Per topic, the Pg makefiles install pg_regress (for use by extensions) and
> > htey install the isolationtester, but they don't install
> > pg_isolation_regress.
> >
> > We should install it too.
I happened to come across this thread by accident, and I tend to agree
that we need to install both isolationtester and pg_isolation_regress to
the pgxs dirs, just like we do pg_regress. I can't find that
isolationtester is installed anywhere though; maybe that changed after
you posted this. Anyway, this version of the patch installs both.
Thanks.
I think rules were added to allow the isolation tester to be installed with an explicit make -C src/test/isolation install, but not added to the default "install" target.
I agree it should just be installed.
--
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: