Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output
| От | Craig Ringer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAMsr+YHa5j6=GMErckU2x_e5=kBK_PuX_1xLSaZth+2qbU_M3A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 26 September 2017 at 01:48, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
On 09/25/2017 10:43 AM, Andres Freund wrote:On 2017-09-25 10:38:52 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:On 09/25/2017 10:32 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote:On 25/09/17 19:26, Tom Lane wrote:Alvaro Hernandez <aht@ongres.com> writes:
There is already about 3 million output plugins out there so I think we
did reasonable job there. The fact that vast majority of that are
various json ones gives reasonable hint that we should have that one in
core though.
And I am sure that 2ndQuadrant would be happy to add it to their version of
Postgres and maintain it themselves.
https://www.2ndquadrant.com/en/resources/2ndqpostgres/
This doesn't seem like a good way to argue.
Sorry, that wasn't supposed to be negative. My point was that 2ndQuadrant has a distribution of Postgres that they support.
For what it's worth, it's mostly things that didn't make it into core for a release, things that got knocked back, backports, etc.
I for one don't want to carry a big delta from core.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: