Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMsr+YH3W=fqvr0qxWAgi7rLCNGrqZ_fjb=OkWjpVUxNXwGEiQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 5 November 2015 at 05:22, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > If I understand to text on wiki, the name is used for tool, that can do > little bit more things, but it is often used for this technique (so it is > much better than "rotate"). I don't understand well, why "crosstab" is too > wrong name. This is pretty similar to COPY - and I know, so in first minutes > hard to explain this difference between COPY and \copy to beginners, but > after day of using there is not any problem. I see constant confusion between \copy and COPY. It's a really good reason NOT to overload other psql commands IMO. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: