Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMsr+YH2o4VHvJy2kfNGpNC-=OLrxwWTodCUx4-FQnjddRuEtg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms (Yuriy Zhuravlev <stalkerg@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 28 May 2018 at 16:02, Yuriy Zhuravlev <stalkerg@gmail.com> wrote:
пн, 28 мая 2018 г. в 16:42, Pierre Ducroquet <p.psql@pinaraf.info>:On Monday, May 28, 2018 4:37:06 AM CEST Yuriy Zhuravlev wrote:
> > Can't see getting rid of those entirely. None of the github style
> > platforms copes with reasonable complex discussions.
>
> I disagree. A good example of complex discussions on github is Rust
> language tracker for RFCs:
> https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues
> and one concrete example: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/2327
> I have no any problem with complex discussions on github.
It is indeed hard to follow on github, and would be even worse with bigger
threads.
Email readers show threads in a hierarchical way, we can see who answered to
who, discussions can fork to completely different aspects of an issue without
being mixed together.Anyway I have no this feature on GMail web interface. But yes, sometimes it's usefull.On github you can make new issue and move some messages, it shoud be done by moderator.
> Anyway, it's much better than tons of emails in your mailbox without tags
> and status of discussion.
A github thread does not show what I read / what I have to read, does it now ?On github you have notifications about new messages in subsribed issues, and if you follow links from https://github.com/notifications these links disappear. Also, don't forget about browser bookmarks and other plugins for that, web much more flexible than emails.
FWIW, I don't agree with your conclusions re the build system. It's more than just a bunch of conservative dinosaurs not wanting to change how they do anything, though you can frame it that way if you like. It's that a change needs to offer really compelling benefits, and I don't think enough people are convinced of those benefits.
--
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: