Re: Stopping logical replication protocol
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Stopping logical replication protocol |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMsr+YGy_JM+xJwHVg_KxH82Yk-qVqxy_UgPZn=c4BY7bfE0Mg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Stopping logical replication protocol (Vladimir Gordiychuk <folyga@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Stopping logical replication protocol
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 21 October 2016 at 19:38, Vladimir Gordiychuk <folyga@gmail.com> wrote: > Craig, Andres what do you thinks about previous message? I haven't had a chance to look further to be honest. Since a downstream disconnect works, though it's ugly, it's not something I can justify spending a lot of time on, and I already did spend a lot on it in patch review/updating/testing etc. I don't know what Andres wants, but I think CopyFail with ERRCODE_QUERY_CANCELED is fine. As for plugins that collect changes in memory and only send them on commit, I'd call them "broken". Not an interesting case IMO. Don't do that. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: