Re: [PATCH] COPY vs \copy HINT
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] COPY vs \copy HINT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMsr+YGsf9zqdZuiqW2x_MG-KC29DREXRds1yrtFSdYz+oc7Og@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] COPY vs \copy HINT (Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] COPY vs \copy HINT
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 5 September 2016 at 16:32, Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote: > The part about the server permissions might be useful to hint at. > What about > > "COPY TO instructs the PostgreSQL server to write to a file on the server. " > "You may want a client-side facility such as psql's \\copy." > > "COPY FROM instructs the PostgreSQL server to read from a file on the server. " > "You may want a client-side facility such as psql's \\copy." > > This stresses more explicitly that the file is opened by the server > process. (I'm not particularly happy that it says "server" in there > twice, but couldn't think of anything else.) Tom, any preference here? I'm probably inclined to go for your original wording and accept that it's just too hard to hint at the client/server process split in a single short message. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: