Re: Parameter status message not sent?
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Parameter status message not sent? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMsr+YGixMhathSoTpQz1pKNh=w9070BdCs8bUdY5vi=T5vcog@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Parameter status message not sent? (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Parameter status message not sent?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 14 February 2018 at 10:26, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
On 2018-02-14 11:12:30 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> According to the manual, backend sends a parameter status message when
> certain configuration variable has been changed and SIGHUP signal is sent.
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/protocol-flow. html#PROTOCOL-ASYNC
>
> ParameterStatus messages will be generated whenever the active value
> changes for any of the parameters the backend believes the frontend
> should know about. Most commonly this occurs in response to a SET
> SQL command executed by the frontend, and this case is effectively
> synchronous ― but it is also possible for parameter status changes
> to occur because the administrator changed a configuration file and
> then sent the SIGHUP signal to the server.
>
> So I connected to PostgreSQL using psql and attached strace to psql.
> Then I changed standard_conforming_strings and executed pg_ctl
> reload. The PostgreSQL log shows:
>
> 12073 2018-02-14 11:05:22 JST LOG: received SIGHUP, reloading configuration files
> 12073 2018-02-14 11:05:22 JST LOG: parameter "standard_conforming_strings" changed to "off"
> 12073 2018-02-14 11:05:22 JST DEBUG: sending signal 1 to process 12158
>
> But as far as strace tells, nothing was sent to psql. Is this expected?
It'll only get sent to the client the next time the server processes a
query. We can't just at arbitrary points reload the config file or send
messages out. The SIGHUP handler just sets ConfigReloadPending which
PostgresMain() then processes:
/*
* (6) check for any other interesting events that happened while we
* slept.
*/
if (ConfigReloadPending)
{
ConfigReloadPending = false;
ProcessConfigFile(PGC_SIGHUP);
}
which'll then, in turn, send out ParameterStatus messages for changed
GUC_REPORT GUCs.
I was wondering a while ago - can't we just set our own proc's latch here, so we wake up and send it earlier if we're in the idle main loop?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: