Re: 2018-03 Commitfest Summary (Andres #1)
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 2018-03 Commitfest Summary (Andres #1) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMsr+YGbSbkqBJcMCR3-=Jq9zuCGkGHQXzwAzn8bm1Y3dBqY+g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 2018-03 Commitfest Summary (Andres #1) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2 March 2018 at 02:37, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2018-03-01 14:09:02 +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>>> A bit concerned that we're turning pgbench into a kitchen sink.
>> I do not understand "kitchen sink" expression in this context, and your
>> general concerns about pgbench in various comments in your message.
> We're adding a lot of stuff to pgbench that only a few people
> use. There's a lot of duplication with similar parts of code in other
> parts of the codebase. pgbench in my opinion is a tool to facilitate
> postgres development, not a goal in itself.
FWIW, I share Andres' concern that pgbench is being extended far past
what anyone has shown a need for. If we had infinite resources this
wouldn't be a big problem, but it's eating into limited committer hours
and I'm not really convinced that we're getting adequate return.
I have similar worries about us growing an ad-hoc scripting language in psql.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: