Re: Time to get rid of PQnoPasswordSupplied?
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Time to get rid of PQnoPasswordSupplied? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMsr+YGLrDpTadh8d0YxV-VY0SwsurUbkKRexNfH6O8uO3jWeA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Time to get rid of PQnoPasswordSupplied? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 22 June 2015 at 22:00, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I do not follow Craig's argument that this is somehow connected to the > wire protocol version. Upon revisiting it, neither do I. You know when you read code and think "what idiot wrote this" ... then "git blame" says it was you? I, at least, know that feeling... and that's what reading that part of that email was like. Tom's right, of course. It's libpq-to-client. The string "fe_sendauth: no password supplied" never goes over the wire; it's a response libpq generates in response to an auth failure ErrorResponse message from the server. It's only relevant for libpq-based clients. Lets change it. PgAdmin-III will need a patch, but that's about the only client I found that would care. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: