Re: Complicated re-distribution of pgjdbc the "open source way"
| От | Craig Ringer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Complicated re-distribution of pgjdbc the "open source way" |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAMsr+YG5s+GUMd1PxhCa4qRp75cctmN__jcKYRJ5s=FYSwtRfw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Complicated re-distribution of pgjdbc the "open source way" (Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@redhat.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Complicated re-distribution of pgjdbc the "open source way"
|
| Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On 10 March 2016 at 14:14, Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi Craig and Dave,thanks for all your good comments! This is definitely the preferred way
On Thursday 10 of March 2016 12:19:33 Craig Ringer wrote:
> So ... any interest in doing this via Maven profiles?
>
> Dave and I agree that that's the way forward as far as PgJDBC goes. It'd
> let you avoid patching PgJDBC sources in the rpm spec and having to
> maintain that spec patch, while still building without needing things not
> packed in Fedora.
>
> Thoughts, comments?
to go, Allow me some time to process this, I'll update this thread as soon
as possible.
Cool.
It might be a good idea to speak to maintainers of some of the Maven-based Fedora packages, as they'll probably be able to offer some hints/guidance on the details when it comes to creating profiles, conditionally compiling files, etc.
I haven't verified that you can use maven profiles to avoid the OSGi stuff, but it'll certainly do the job for Waffle-JNA and the couple of isolated files in PgJDBC that use it.
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: