Re: Built-in connection pooling
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Built-in connection pooling |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMsr+YFponiat0e6LAh52JsGpgwec4OKXASK7aXGpDSs555Srw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Built-in connection pooling (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: Built-in connection pooling
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 18 April 2018 at 19:52, Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > As far as I know most of DBMSes have some kind of internal connection > pooling. > Oracle, for example, you can create dedicated and non-dedicated backends. > I wonder why we do not want to have something similar in Postgres. I want to, and I know many others to. But the entire PostgreSQL architecture makes it hard to do well, and means it requires heavy changes to do it in a way that will be maintainable and reliable. Making it work, and making something maintainble and mergeable, are two different things. Something I continue to struggle with myself. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: