Re: access/parallel.h lacks PGDLLIMPORT
| От | Craig Ringer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: access/parallel.h lacks PGDLLIMPORT |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAMsr+YFGwc1TLEFACm+PQ0Qq7-RT9YGgv0L__9JWxxuPijxxBg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: access/parallel.h lacks PGDLLIMPORT (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 19 December 2017 at 23:24, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 3:36 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> I also think it is good to allow ParallelWorkerNumber to be used in
> extensions. Attached is the patch for same. I think for other two we
> should wait till there is really a good use case for them.
I think waiting for a "really good" use case is too high a bar. I
think we only need to think that there is a "reasonable" use case.
Accordingly, I pushed a commit adding PGDLLIMPORT to both
ParallelWorkerNumber and InitializingParallelWorker.
Especially since all non-static *functions* are exported unconditionally, so it's not like we set a high bar for public API.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: