Re: 9.6 TAP tests and extensions

On 27 October 2016 at 00:42, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> On 2016-09-23 16:04:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Looking back over the thread, I see that you also proposed installing
>>> isolationtester and pg_isolation_regress for the benefit of extensions.
>>> I'm very much less excited about that idea.  It'd be substantially more
>>> dead weight in typical installations, and I'm not sure that it'd be useful
>>> to common extensions, and I'm not eager to treat isolationtester's API
>>> and behavior as something we need to hold stable for extension use.
>>
>> FWIW, I'd be quite happy if it were installed. Running isolationtester
>> when compiling extensions against distribution postgres packages would
>> be quite useful.
>
> +1.

Patch attached.

--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services