Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMsr+YEkr6wsE=QjekSjW=Mbwn+Kt9fkMt69w7UQGK2bMfJSXQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2 March 2016 at 13:22, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I wrote:
>> > Can't use string ("Test::Builder") as a HASH ref while "strict refs" in use at /usr/share/perl5/Test/Builder.pm line 1798.
>>
>> > The referenced line number is the end of the file,
>>
>> Oh, scratch that; I was looking at the wrong file. Actually,
>> /usr/share/perl5/Test/Builder.pm has
>>
>> sub details {
>> my $self = shift;
>> return @{ $self->{Test_Results} };
>> }
>>
>> and line 1798 is the "return" statement in that. I still lack enough
>> Perl-fu to decipher this, though.
>
> I think it's complaining about being called as a class method. Perhaps
> this would work:
>
> + foreach my $detail (Test::More->builder->details())
Yes, that's the problem. Instead of using details(), summary() is
enough actually. And it is enough to let caller know the failure when
just one test has been found as not passing. See attached.
Thanks.
I'm setting up a container with Debian Wheezy, which looks old enough to test proposed framework changes, so I'll be able to test future patches against a real Perl 5.8.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: