Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2
| От | Craig Ringer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAMsr+YET57YUnePwhs_GMKLwCrPAo_=Q4hc-DrbDxRnYA01qxw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2 (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 24 Jan. 2017 18:00, "Andres Freund" <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
On 2017-01-24 15:50:47 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:I'm doubtful about this being ready in time too, but it seems a might
> I am marking this patch as "returned with feedback". That's quite a
> heavy change and it looks to be too late in the development cycle of
> PG10 to consider it. Peter's commit bits, who is also the reviewer,
> are beginning to smoke as well after everything that has happened for
> the logical replication changes.
heavyhanded to make that call on your own. Including the judgement about
Peter's capability to handle more.
Personally I think we should aim to have this in as a non default build mode in pg10 if it can be made ready, and aim to make it default in pg11 at least for Windows.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: