Re: Some questions about the array.
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Some questions about the array. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMsr+YEBNQ304w+wwWev8mi_Ag6SoyBQiz8zRtVUu3OqzbHExQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Some questions about the array. (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Some questions about the array.
Re: Some questions about the array. Re: Some questions about the array. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 6 November 2015 at 12:45, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:57 AM, YUriy Zhuravlev > <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru> wrote: >> Hello hackers. >> There are comments to my patch? Maybe I should create a separate thread? >> Thanks. > > You should add this on commitfest.postgresql.org. > > I think the first question that needs to be answered is "do we want > this?". I'm sure I know your answer, but what do other people think? Omitted bounds are common in other languages and would be handy. I don't think they'd cause any issues with multi-dimensional arrays or variable start-pos arrays. I'd love negative indexes, but the variable-array-start (mis)feature means we can't have those. I wouldn't shed a tear if variable-start-position arrays were deprecated and removed, but that's a multi-year process, and I'm not convinced negative indexes justify it even though the moveable array start pos feature seems little-used. Since the start-pos is recorded in the array, I wonder if it's worth supporting negative indexing for arrays with the default 1-indexed element numbering, and just ERRORing for others. Does anyone really use anything else? -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: