Re: [HACKERS] legitimacy of using PG_TRY , PG_CATCH , PG_END_TRY in C function

On 23 October 2017 at 16:16, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 23 October 2017 at 08:30, John Lumby <johnlumby@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> All works but not perfectly --  at COMMIT,  resource_owner issues
>> relcache reference leak messages about relation scans not closed
>> and also about  snapshot still active.     I guess that the CREATE has
>> switched resource_owner and pushed a snapshot,  but I did not
>> debug in detail.
>
> A lot more work is required than what's done pg PG_CATCH to return to
> a queryable state. I've been down this path myself, and it's not fun.

Ignore me, Tom's example is probably more relevant to you since it
applies to subtransactions, not top-level query state.

-- Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers