Re: [HACKERS] Issues with logical replication
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Issues with logical replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMsr+YE4CDohD_QB5yUpGk0SYOxkR_hsruNk+=FYv5Fp8A3U8g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Issues with logical replication (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4 October 2017 at 07:35, Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
Okay, so it's not snapshot. It's the fact that we don't set theOn 02/10/17 18:59, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>
>> Now fix the trigger function:
>> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION replication_trigger_proc() RETURNS TRIGGER AS $$
>> BEGIN
>> RETURN NEW;
>> END $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
>>
>> And manually perform at master two updates inside one transaction:
>>
>> postgres=# begin;
>> BEGIN
>> postgres=# update pgbench_accounts set abalance=abalance+1 where aid=26;
>> UPDATE 1
>> postgres=# update pgbench_accounts set abalance=abalance-1 where aid=26;
>> UPDATE 1
>> postgres=# commit;
>> <hangs>
>>
>> and in replica log we see:
>> 2017-10-02 18:40:26.094 MSK [2954] LOG: logical replication apply
>> worker for subscription "sub" has started
>> 2017-10-02 18:40:26.101 MSK [2954] ERROR: attempted to lock invisible
>> tuple
>> 2017-10-02 18:40:26.102 MSK [2882] LOG: worker process: logical
>> replication worker for subscription 16403 (PID 2954) exited with exit
>> code 1
>>
>> Error happens in trigger.c:
>>
>> #3 0x000000000069bddb in GetTupleForTrigger (estate=0x2e36b50,
>> epqstate=0x7ffc4420eda0, relinfo=0x2dcfe90, tid=0x2dd08ac,
>> lockmode=LockTupleNoKeyExclusive, newSlot=0x7ffc4420ec40) at
>> trigger.c:3103
>> #4 0x000000000069b259 in ExecBRUpdateTriggers (estate=0x2e36b50,
>> epqstate=0x7ffc4420eda0, relinfo=0x2dcfe90, tupleid=0x2dd08ac,
>> fdw_trigtuple=0x0, slot=0x2dd0240) at trigger.c:2748
>> #5 0x00000000006d2395 in ExecSimpleRelationUpdate (estate=0x2e36b50,
>> epqstate=0x7ffc4420eda0, searchslot=0x2dd0358, slot=0x2dd0240)
>> at execReplication.c:461
>> #6 0x0000000000820894 in apply_handle_update (s=0x7ffc442163b0) at
>> worker.c:736
>
> We have locked the same tuple in RelationFindReplTupleByIndex() just
> before this gets called and didn't get the same error. I guess we do
> something wrong with snapshots. Will need to investigate more.
>
es_output_cid in replication worker which GetTupleForTrigger is using
when locking the tuple. Attached one-liner fixes it.
This seems like a clear-cut bug with a simple fix.
Lets get this committed, so we don't lose it. The rest of the thread is going off into the weeds a bit issues unrelated to the original problem.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: