Re: [HACKERS] pg_receivewal and messages printed in non-verbose mode
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pg_receivewal and messages printed in non-verbose mode |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMsr+YE0BvFDPYf4WvS622=_5UoDnKKJUAPo7+ti8_aJ0PCf8g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] pg_receivewal and messages printed in non-verbose mode (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pg_receivewal and messages printed in non-verbose mode
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 13 June 2017 at 14:33, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have noticed that the following messages can show up from > pg_receivewal even if the verbose mode is not used: > if (prevtimeline != 0 && prevtimeline != timeline) > fprintf(stderr, _("%s: switched to timeline %u at %X/%X\n"), > progname, timeline, > (uint32) (prevpos >> 32), (uint32) prevpos); > if (time_to_abort) > { > fprintf(stderr, _("%s: received interrupt signal, exiting\n"), > progname); > return true; > } > Those come from stop_streaming in pg_receivewal.c. Shouldn't those > messages only show up to the user if --verbose is used? It seems > strange to me that at least the first one is written to the user as > that's not an error after promoting a standby. I agree. At least the first should be --verbose only. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: