Re: Two fsync related performance issues?
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Two fsync related performance issues? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMsr+YE-iMNXPcqeb3XEewdvttpJ7O1hdMTRJVoL+qCFmx1u3A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Two fsync related performance issues? (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 15:41, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 07:39:30PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020, 13:06 Michael Paquier, <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> Yeah, it is safer to assume that it is the responsability of the
>> backup tool to ensure that because it could be possible that a host is
>> unplugged just after taking a backup, and having Postgres do this work
>> at the beginning of archive recovery would not help in most cases.
>
> Let's document that assumption in the docs for pg_basebackup and the file
> system copy based replica creation docs. With a reference to initdb's
> datadir sync option.
Do you have any suggestion about that, in the shape of a patch perhaps?
I'll try to get to that, but I have some other docs patches outstanding that I'd like to resolve first.
--
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: