Re: Question and suggestion about application binary compatibility policy
| От | Craig Ringer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Question and suggestion about application binary compatibility policy |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAMsr+YE+tft3YOMQ-iuMA6gT8tOt5vtzJ7NaL-7WQrY-2E5gDA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Question and suggestion about application binary compatibility policy ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Craig Ringer
While that's probably OK, it's not especially desirable. The typical Windows deployment model involves the application bundling all its direct dependencies except when those are provided by a runtime redistributable designed for that purpose.
I think so, too, but I'm not confident that's typical. Some people may think of PostgreSQL binaries as a shared component for their applications and place it in one place, just like the PostgreSQL library package is in /usr/lib/pgsql.
There's a client-only installation method as follows, although I haven't checked whether EnterpriseDB, OpenSCG, or any other PostgreSQL-based products provide client-only installation.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/install-windows-full.html#AEN30192
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: