Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column
От | Isaac Morland |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMsGm5dt-hmm_LKGu=Taecb+RHEeKrh=Ss7gr2+3C__w_ywoUw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column (Gilles Darold <gilles@migops.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 at 17:42, Gilles Darold <gilles@migops.com> wrote:
Yes, my first though was to allow all columns to be unexpandable like a
table without column, but the the problem is that when you execute
"SELECT * FROM nada" it returns no rows which is not the case of a table
with hidden column. I could fix that to return no rows if all columns
are unexpandable but I think that all column hidden is a nonsens so I
have prefered to not allow it and an error is raised.
Perhaps I misunderstand what you are saying, but a no-columns table definitely can return rows:
Type "help" for help.
postgres=# create table nada ();
CREATE TABLE
postgres=# insert into nada default values;
INSERT 0 1
postgres=# insert into nada default values;
INSERT 0 1
postgres=# table nada;
--
(2 rows)
postgres=#
Note that psql doesn't display a separate line for each row in this case, but the actual result coming back from the server does contain the appropriate number of rows.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: