Re: popcount
От | Isaac Morland |
---|---|
Тема | Re: popcount |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMsGm5dKEDVJRN1qw=mz_mQPKR7=n9H5bVif--doWmePnVQ51Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: popcount (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 11:38, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
You bring up an excellent point, which is that our builtin functions
could use a lot more documentation directly to hand than they now
have. For example, there's a lot of needless ambiguity created by
function comments which leave it up in the air as to which positional
argument does what in functions like string_to_array, which take
multiple arguments. I'll try to get a patch in for the next CF with a
fix for that, and a separate one that doesn't put it on people to use
\df+ to find the comments we do provide. There have been proposals for
including an optional space for COMMENT ON in DDL, but I suspect that
those won't fly unless and until they make their way into the
standard.
Since you mention \df+, I wonder if this is the time to consider removing the source code from \df+ (since we have \sf) and adding in the proacl instead?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: