Re: configure can't detect proper pthread flags
От | Max Filippov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: configure can't detect proper pthread flags |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMo8BfLTVQSeOUvyDfsN-KQV914xRDjHePP=Rt+V2LB9avNnuQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: configure can't detect proper pthread flags (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: configure can't detect proper pthread flags
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> We don't want every link step producing a useless warning. >>> Ideally, "make -s" would print nothing whatsoever; to the extent that >>> tools produce unsuppressable routine chatter, that's evil because it >>> makes it harder to notice actually-useful warnings. >> >> Then maybe stderr tests should grep output for a specific option, the >> one we're currently testing, not just any noise? > > That sounds awfully fragile to me. It can't really be safe to assume > we know precisely what the warning messages will look like. Yes, I agree, not very good. Ok, one more attempt: maybe instead of checking that stderr is empty we could check that stderr has changed in the presence of the option that we test? -- Thanks. -- Max
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: