Re: psql \d+ and oid display
| От | Jeff Janes |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: psql \d+ and oid display |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAMkU=1zs1KdzkukP0QVb_JhR6n-ru0MC0RLXvTqqVtKR_p8G7w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: psql \d+ and oid display (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: psql \d+ and oid display
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:30:54AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:Well, there are lot of _other_ things we could display about the table
> > OK, I have now applied the conditional display of "Replica Identity"
> > patch (which is how it was originally coded anyway). The attached patch
> > matches Tom's suggestion of displaying the same OID text, just
> > conditionally.
> >
> > Seeing psql \d+ will have a conditional display line in PG 9.4, making
> > OIDs conditional seems to make sense.
>
> Frankly, I think this is all completely wrong-headed. \d+ should
> display *everything*. That's what the + means, isn't it? Coming up
> with complex rules for which things get shown and which things get
> hidden just makes the output harder to understand, without any
> compensating benefit.
that we don't. Are you suggesting we add those too?
I am suggesting it for at least some other things. I'm rather aggrieved that "\d+" without argument shows you the size and the description/comment for every table, but "\d+ foo" does not show you the size and description/comment of the specific table you just asked for.
Not so aggrieved that I wrote and submitted a patch, you might notice; but I'll get to it eventually if no one beats me to it.
Cheers,
Jeff
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: