Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor
От | Jeff Janes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMkU=1zqxSh+KrSEmnxCxzveza_uBbbsgALsR5Ngy85DFuZqog@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote: > On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 11:32 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote: >> Looking at the patch, I noticed that it's possible to specify the default >> boundaries ([], [), (] or ()) per individual float type with the >> DEFAULT_FLAGS clause of CREATE TYPE .. AS RANGE. I wonder if that doesn't >> do more harm then good - it makes it impossible to deduce the meaning of >> e.g. numericrange(1.0, 2.0) without looking up the definition of numericrange. >> >> I suggest we pick one set of default boundaries, ideally '[)' since that >> is what all the built-in canonization functions produce, and stick with it. > > Done. > > Also, made the range parsing even more like records with more code > copied verbatim. And fixed some parsing tests along the way. When I apply this to head, "make check" fails with: create type textrange_en_us as range(subtype=text, collation="en_US"); + ERROR: collation "en_US" for encoding "SQL_ASCII" does not exist Is this a problem? e.g. will it break the build-farm? "make check LANG=en_US" does pass Cheers, Jeff
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: