Re: BUG #15335: Documentation is wrong about archive_command andexisting files

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Janes
Тема Re: BUG #15335: Documentation is wrong about archive_command andexisting files
Дата
Msg-id CAMkU=1zo8bPjkvrSF=PWG4GEkQBYhNPD32Dd9a0DuqF-+4XwNg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #15335: Documentation is wrong about archive_command andexisting files  ("Phil Endecott" <spam_from_pgsql_lists@chezphil.org>)
Ответы Re: BUG #15335: Documentation is wrong about archive_command andexisting files  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Дерево обсуждения
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Phil Endecott <spam_from_pgsql_lists@chezphil.org> wrote:
Hi Jeff,

Jeff Janes wrote:
The possibilities are endless, and an example cannot cover all of them while still usefully serving as an example. There are canned systems for handling this more thoroughly, and you should look into using one of them.

 Do you believe that the docs should point this out?

Currently there are about 18,000 words of what appears to be very
thorough documentation about implementing replication, yet they
do not refer the reader to tools like pgBackRest.  When I post
about the issues that I have had, the overwhelming view of the
mailing lists is that pgBackRest is essential - yet this important
advice is not conveyed to new users of this feature who are relying
on the official documentation.


I think it might be a good idea to propose use of a canned solution, but I don't know how the community would feel about mentioning specific projects by name.  And if we didn't mention any by name, I think it would be pretty awkward to advise to give.

Cheers,

Jeff

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: PG Bug reporting form
Дата:
Сообщение: BUG #15340: FATAL ERROR: The application server could not becontacted.
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #15335: Documentation is wrong about archive_command andexisting files