Re: Have an encrypted pgpass file
От | Jeff Janes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Have an encrypted pgpass file |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMkU=1z1h1Yq3EJ9+501Om==mXsFNabZ6x744B1S_8EjJHx_Sw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Have an encrypted pgpass file (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Have an encrypted pgpass file
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:46 AM, Marco van Eck <marco.vaneck@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Since .pgpass files contain plain-text passwords, I searched for an
>> alternative.
>> In the attached patch I've added the possibility to run a command to produce
>> the content of the pgpass file, in exactly the same format.
> ... Here you side step those questions completely and make that the end
> user's problem. I like it.
... but doesn't this just encourage people to build hacks that aren't
really any more secure than the unreadable-file approach? In fact,
I'm afraid this would be an attractive nuisance, in that people would
build one-off hacks that get no security vetting and don't really work.
I'd like to see a concrete example of a use-case that really does add
security; preferably one short and useful enough to put into the docs
so that people might copy-and-paste it rather than rolling their own.
It seems possible that something of the sort could be built atop
ssh-agent or gpg-agent, for instance.
If the goal is not unattended operation but just unannoying operation, I think the first example he provided is already that use-case. If you already have gpg configured to use gpg-agent, then it just works. You get encryption-at-rest, and you don't have to type in your password repeatedly in the same continuous shell session.
Cheers,
Jeff
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: