Re: pg_rewarm status
| От | Jeff Janes |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_rewarm status |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAMkU=1yw4Yj5Yurh6_01aRkUSgUEvXn-TVmKf8qDj5bQPEoZQg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | pg_rewarm status (Jeff Amiel <becauseimjeff@yahoo.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Jeff Amiel <becauseimjeff@yahoo.com> wrote:
Trying to follow the threads and other references - but I can't determine where this patch ended up.
(http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmobRrRxCO+t6gcQrw_dJw+Uf9ZEdwf9beJnu+RB5TEBjEw@mail.gmail.com)
I'm
trying to experiment with some new hardware - and the functionality to
add specific tables/indexes into cache ahead of time will benefit me
greatly.
I found a page describing how to apply the patch to 9.2.4 (jumping through some hoops - http://issues.collectionspace.org/browse/UCJEPS-432) and was hoping to get a version to apply to 9.3.X
Can
anyone advise me on how I might get this 'applied' to a 9.3.X source
code base or any other options to denote specific relations that I'd
like to get directly into shared_buffers?
In my experience the installation in 9.3.X the same way as it does in 9.2.4.
Cheers,
Jeff
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: