Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption
| От | Jeff Janes |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAMkU=1yiNq_S6-iULaMS-ciHmxBWc4TzpNQG2gCRsGgb7zYkaQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 9:58 PM, John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com> wrote:
On 11/2/2017 9:39 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:The SCRAM discussion is spread across two threads mainly with hundreds of emails, which may discourage even the bravest. Here are links to the important documentation: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/auth- methods.html#auth-password so that says... ... [scram-sha-256] is the most secure of the currently provided methods, but it is not supported by older client libraries....
whats the state of the more popular bindings now? jdbc, python native, etc ?
What is 'python native'? psycopg works as long you update your libpq.
Cheers,
Jeff
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: