Re: Reviewing freeze map code
От | Jeff Janes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reviewing freeze map code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMkU=1ygHztvjr-hS3RRLyYmEdZkTDrwf5Cjch4xa5HLcpZRDQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Reviewing freeze map code (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reviewing freeze map code
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote: > On 05/18/2016 09:55 AM, Victor Yegorov wrote: >> 2016-05-18 16:45 GMT+03:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com >> <mailto:robertmhaas@gmail.com>>: >> >> No, that's what the existing FREEZE option does. This new option is >> about unnecessarily vacuuming pages that don't need it. The >> expectation is that vacuuming all-frozen pages will be a no-op. >> >> >> VACUUM (INCLUDING ALL) ? > > VACUUM (FORCE ALL) ? How about going with something that says more about why we are doing it, rather than trying to describe in one or two words what it is doing? VACUUM (FORENSIC) VACUUM (DEBUG) VACUUM (LINT) Cheers, Jeff
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: