Re: pg_ctl reload -o "...."
От | Jeff Janes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_ctl reload -o "...." |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMkU=1yGU+7JRK2x1E1p6NcsErTLveU2pBBnLmf_WTeCd9A1zg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_ctl reload -o "...." (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_ctl reload -o "...."
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes: >> Is there a reason pg_ctl reload shouldn't honor -o ? > > -o means "pass these switches on the postmaster's command line". > If you're not restarting the postmaster, you don't get to change > its command line. OK. You see pg_ctl as a wrapper around postmaster, while I was viewing it as a thing in itself. > IMO setting stuff on the command line is pretty evil anyway. I wouldn't do it in a production system, but it is invaluable for performance testing during development or diagnosis. Oh well, I guess this is what perl -i -pe is for. Cheers, Jeff
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: