Re: Covering Indexes
От | Jeff Janes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Covering Indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMkU=1yDHXMw_8SKA-O=tLbiMbMKmwYedE=pBhM7KDoB+cp+eg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Covering Indexes ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Covering Indexes
Re: Covering Indexes Re: Covering Indexes |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:16 AM, David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com> wrote: > Hackers, > > Very interesting design document for SQLite 4: > > http://www.sqlite.org/src4/doc/trunk/www/design.wiki > > I'm particularly intrigued by "covering indexes". For example: > > CREATE INDEX cover1 ON table1(a,b) COVERING(c,d); I don't see the virtue of this in this case. Since the index is not unique, why not just put the index on (a,b,c,d) and be done with it? Is there some advantage to be had in inventing a way to store c and d in the index without having them usable for indexing? Cheers, Jeff
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: