Re: Weighted Stats
От | Jeff Janes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Weighted Stats |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMkU=1y45wFL72-HkFo9SDR=Gont9qxR3=H+JzuH7=ok=PQb7w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Weighted Stats (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Weighted Stats
Re: Weighted Stats |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 8:36 AM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote: > > Please find attached a patch that uses the float8 version to cover the > numeric types. Is there a well-defined meaning for having a negative weight? If no, should it be disallowed? I don't know what I was expecting, but not this: select weighted_avg(x,10000000-2*x) from generate_series(1,10000000) f(x); weighted_avg ------------------16666671666717.1 Also, I think it might not give the correct answer even without negative weights: create table foo as select floor(random()*10000)::int val from generate_series(1,10000000); create table foo2 as select val, count(*) from foo group by val; Shouldn't these then give the same result: select stddev_samp(val) from foo; stddev_samp -------------------2887.054977297105 select weighted_stddev_samp(val,count) from foo2;weighted_stddev_samp ---------------------- 2887.19919651336 The 5th digit seems too early to be seeing round-off error. Cheers, Jeff
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: