operator family changes, sinval bug?
От | Jeff Janes |
---|---|
Тема | operator family changes, sinval bug? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMkU=1xx1_Rj24xjQcqHo-Gjk0rh_XaocWAW=br=My-Ac=3X-A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: operator family changes, sinval bug?
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
When I drop the optional triconsistent support function for a gin index operator family, the system continues to use the function to support index queries anyway, until I close the session and restart it, at which point it reverts to using the binary consistent function. Is this a bug in the cache invalidation mechanism? Or am I just expecting too much of it? On one occasion, I got a ERROR: cache lookup failed for function 16442 when trying to do the query using the gin index, but usually it just continues to work as expected even though it is invoking a function which no longer exists. I see the same behavior in both 9.4.4 and in HEAD. Cheers, Jeff alter operator family gin_foobar_ops using gin drop function 6 (text,text); drop function gin_foobar_triconsistent ( internal, smallint, text, integer, internal, internal, internal) ;
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: