Re: how could select id=xx so slow?
От | Jeff Janes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: how could select id=xx so slow? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMkU=1xb-5uqpc=fG42vmWUo9RrxDKE5pnwpNHBY=4rs8XE39g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: how could select id=xx so slow? (Ants Aasma <ants@cybertec.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: how could select id=xx so slow?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Ants Aasma <ants@cybertec.at> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Yan Chunlu <springrider@gmail.com> wrote: >> yes the system seems overloaded, I am dealing with a simple "INSERT" but not >> sure if it is normal that it took more time than the explain estimated: > > The estimated cost is in arbitrary units, its purpose is to compare > different execution plans, not estimate time taken. So it's completely > normal that it doesn't match actual time taken. Right. And to make explicit what you implied, when there is only one to do something (like insert a row, or do maintenance on an index) it often doesn't even attempt to cost that at all as there is no choice. So it is not just a matter of units. Cheers, Jeff
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: