Re: Figuring out shared buffer pressure
От | Jeff Janes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Figuring out shared buffer pressure |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMkU=1xY--OrEw=SAKNCUcE-BzjpCysbnV1x0cCrM_p278N2Ew@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Figuring out shared buffer pressure (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Figuring out shared buffer pressure
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:38:10AM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote: >> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> > As part of a blog, I started looking at how a user could measure the >> > pressure on shared buffers, e.g. how much are they being used, recycled, >> > etc. >> > >> > They way you normally do it on older operating systems is to see how >> > many buffers on the free list (about to be reused) are reclaimed as >> > needed --- that usually indicates kernel cache pressure. Unfortunately, >> > we don't have a freelist, except for initial assignment of shared >> > buffers on startup. >> >> Isn't that what the buffers_alloc from pg_stat_bgwriter is ? > > The issue is that once a buffer is removed from the free list, it is > never returned to the free list. A buffer doesn't need to be removed from the linked list in order for buffers_alloc to get incremented. Conceptually, the freelist consists not only of the linked list, but also of all unpinned buffers with a usagecount of zero. Cheers, Jeff
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: