Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
От | Jeff Janes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMkU=1wyUvAYgHu_o-_EePHw-7sda=c8Mm2Kh4mKZr6j+oKtjg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. (Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > > 18.01.2016 01:02, David Rowley пишет: > > On 14 January 2016 at 08:24, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: >> >> I will try to review the omit_opclass_4.0.patch soon. > > > Hi, as promised, here's my review of the omit_opclass_4.0.patch patch. > > Thank you again. All mentioned points are fixed and patches are merged. > I hope it's all right now. Please check comments one more time. I rather > doubt that I wrote everything correctly. Unfortunately there are several merge conflicts between your patch and this commit: commit 65c5fcd353a859da9e61bfb2b92a99f12937de3b Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sun Jan 17 19:36:59 2016 -0500 Restructure index access method API to hide most of it at the C level. Can you rebase past that commit? Thanks, Jeff
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: