Re: [HACKERS] uninterruptible state in 10beta4
От | Jeff Janes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] uninterruptible state in 10beta4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMkU=1wgDapzw2vvWs92385zK1jvHz6SSybBMsChmMBZOEsKrA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] uninterruptible state in 10beta4 (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] uninterruptible state in 10beta4
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
Hi,
On 2017-09-13 14:28:34 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
> In 10beta4 and 11dev, If I run the below it enters an uninterruptible
> state. After the insert starts, I give 15 or seconds or so until the
> memory usage starts to grow due to enqueued triggers checks. Then I can't
> interrupt it with either ctrl-C in psql or kill -15 <pid> from another
> terminal.
>
> I have to do kill -9 <pid>
>
> create table foo (x int);
> create or replace function notice () returns trigger as $$ begin raise
> notice 'asdfsdf'; return NEW; END;$$ language plpgsql;
> create trigger foobar after insert on foo for each row execute procedure
> notice();
> insert into foo select * from generate_series(1,100000000);
>
> Git bisect lays the blame here which certainly seems plausible:
>
> commit d47cfef7116fb36349949f5c757aa2112c249804
> Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
> Date: Tue Jul 25 17:37:17 2017 -0700
>
> Move interrupt checking from ExecProcNode() to executor nodes.
Indeed that seems plausible. I guess something like the attached should
fix the issue?
Yep, that fixes it.
Thanks,
Jeff
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: