Re: [GENERAL] Perfomance of IN-clause with many elements and possible solutions
| От | Jeff Janes |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Perfomance of IN-clause with many elements and possible solutions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAMkU=1we8pXTzUaxY7d7T7ww9s74sjU+mje=yHi=8gH7Zix6Pg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Perfomance of IN-clause with many elements and possiblesolutions (Dmitry Lazurkin <dilaz03@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Perfomance of IN-clause with many elements and possiblesolutions
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Dmitry Lazurkin <dilaz03@gmail.com> wrote:
On 25.07.2017 00:31, David G. Johnston wrote:
This query uses JOIN plan node as IN (VALUES ...).
And I have one question. I don't understand why IN-VALUES doesn't use Semi-Join? PostgreSQL has Hash Semi-Join... For which task the database has node of this type?
I think it is simply because no one has gotten around to implementing it that way. When you can just write it as a values list instead, the incentive to make the regular in-list work better is not all that strong.
Cheers,
Jeff
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: