Re: pgbench vs. SERIALIZABLE
| От | Jeff Janes |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pgbench vs. SERIALIZABLE |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAMkU=1wXd_4z+EvJ1fEf7-JNZ+N+FYwckjkv6A3LJqyyDaP-DQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pgbench vs. SERIALIZABLE (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pgbench vs. SERIALIZABLE
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> wrote:
seemed very interested and someone argued that a tool to do thatI raised this issue near the end of SSI development, but nobody
would be good but we shouldn't try to do it in pgbench -- so I let
it drop at the time.
I think it would be good to do it in pgbench, provided it can be done fairly cleanly.
Presumably we would want to repeat all of the ordinary commands, in the file, but not any of the backslash set commands that precede any ordinary commands. But what if backslash set commands are sprinkled between ordinary commands?
Cheers,
Jeff
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: