Re: Doubts about replication..
| От | Laurentius Purba |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Doubts about replication.. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAMfLBnivJ4XiMrpWOHbdfAWL47ad4-OdMfEkg1Fhpos7+qO1qw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Doubts about replication.. (Edmundo Robles <edmundo@sw-argos.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
I use Barman, and I am happy with it.
Just in case you want to try different tools, https://github.com/dhamaniasad/awesome-postgres.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Edmundo Robles <edmundo@sw-argos.com> wrote:
Yes, you are right, the replication is not a backup ;) , actually i backup database daily at 3:00 am but if database crash, the amount of data is big! that is the reason i want to replicate to reduce the data loss. By the way a few days ago a job partner did a delete with no where.--On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 1:33 PM, Andreas Kretschmer <andreas@a-kretschmer.de> wrote:
Am 19.04.2018 um 19:57 schrieb Edmundo Robles:I will use replication as simple backup.
please keep in mind, replication is not a backup. All logical errors on the master (delete from table and forgot the where-condition) will replicated to the standby.
Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: