Re: Eager aggregation, take 3
От | Richard Guo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Eager aggregation, take 3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMbWs4_v2P2hWbENT8UZG-t_A9TuPGJYas29FUcqx9EoETG6Gg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Eager aggregation, take 3 (Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Eager aggregation, take 3
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 8:55 AM Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com> wrote: > The query 31 seems bad, I don't know if I'm doing something completely > wrong but I've just setup a TPC-DS database and then executed the query > on master and with the v23 patch and I got these results: > > Master: > Planning Time: 3.191 ms > Execution Time: 16950.619 ms > > Patch: > Planning Time: 3.257 ms > Execution Time: 3848355.646 ms Thanks for reporting this. It does seem odd. I checked the TPC-DS benchmarking on v13 and found that the execution time for query 31, with and without eager aggregation, is as follows: EAGER-AGG-OFF EAGER-AGG-ON q31 10463.536 ms 10244.175 ms There appears to be a regression between v13 and v23. Looking into it... - Richard
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: