Re: postgres_fdw: wrong results with self join + enable_nestloop off

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Richard Guo
Тема Re: postgres_fdw: wrong results with self join + enable_nestloop off
Дата
Msg-id CAMbWs49giYXU3HHdMbNJ+rb+brH6HaW88o-csqbBXNGhQ-Q=1Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: postgres_fdw: wrong results with self join + enable_nestloop off  (Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: postgres_fdw: wrong results with self join + enable_nestloop off  (Suraj Kharage <suraj.kharage@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 8:51 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
I think that the root cause for this issue would be in the
create_scan_plan handling of pseudoconstant quals when creating a
foreign-join (or custom-join) plan.

Yes exactly.  In create_scan_plan, we are supposed to extract all the
pseudoconstant clauses and use them as one-time quals in a gating Result
node.  Currently we check against rel->baserestrictinfo and ppi_clauses
for the pseudoconstant clauses.  But for scans of foreign joins, we do
not have any restriction clauses in these places and thus the gating
Result node as well as the pseudoconstant clauses would just be lost.

I looked at Nishant's patch.  IIUC it treats the pseudoconstant clauses
as local conditions.  While it can fix the wrong results issue, I think
maybe it's better to still treat the pseudoconstant clauses as one-time
quals in a gating node.  So I wonder if we can store the restriction
clauses for foreign joins in ForeignPath, just as what we do for normal
JoinPath, and then check against them for pseudoconstant clauses in
create_scan_plan, something like attached.

BTW, while going through the codes I noticed one place in
add_foreign_final_paths that uses NULL for List *.  I changed it to NIL.

Thanks
Richard
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Missing update of all_hasnulls in BRIN opclasses
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ssl tests aren't concurrency safe due to get_free_port()