Re: Assert failure of the cross-check for nullingrels
От | Richard Guo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Assert failure of the cross-check for nullingrels |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMbWs48mnX6bqHPQMsjahfjgNB+DzOiuMA_xMwXiODte2TNzdw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Assert failure of the cross-check for nullingrels (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 4:22 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> So, is this done? I see that you made other commits fixing related code
> several days after this email, but none seems to match the changes you
> posted in this patch; and also it's not clear to me that there's any
> test case where this patch is expected to change behavior. (So there's
> also a question of whether this is a bug fix or rather some icying on
> cake.)
This issue is fixed at 991a3df22.
Well, the bugs I was aware of ahead of PGCon are all fixed, but there
are some new reports I still have to deal with. I left the existing
open issue open, but maybe it'd be better to close it and start a new
one?
I went ahead and closed it, and then started two new open items for the
two new issues --- one is about assert failure and wrong query results
due to incorrectly removing PHVs, the other is about inconsistent
nulling bitmap in nestloop parameters.
Thanks
Richard
two new issues --- one is about assert failure and wrong query results
due to incorrectly removing PHVs, the other is about inconsistent
nulling bitmap in nestloop parameters.
Thanks
Richard
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: